Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Cc: fafhrd@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Followup to: The road ahead?
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:42:56
Message-Id: 20051128084232.GB5471@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] Followup to: The road ahead? by dirk.schoenberger@sz-online.de
1 On 27-11-2005 19:51:04 +0100, dirk.schoenberger@×××××××××.de wrote:
2 > - emerge gnustep-make compiles cleanly on ~ppc-macos. I used 1.100-r2
3 > (1.10.1-pre20050312-r1 is package masked) I used USE="layout-osx-like"
4 > - I compiled gnustep-make-1.11.1 manually into local hierarchy /gnustep.
5 > Compile, make make install runs fine.
6 > - Using one of both environments (not quite sure which) I build
7 > renaissance 0.8, the latest version I found to download.
8 > Building is just "source"-ing the the correct environment
9 > XXX/Makefiles/GNUStep.sh, make and make install
10 > Which went without problems.
11 >
12 > So I assume at least a basic ebuild could be created.
13
14 There is an renaissance ebuild in gnustep-libs/renaissance. Did that
15 one fail?
16
17 Ok, this means keywording some of the GNUstep stuff then (where
18 possible) and making some contacts with the GNUstep maintainer fafhrd
19 (CC-ed on this mail), to see if he would like some some OSX
20 compatibility where necessary. Looking through the gnustep.eclass I
21 can't see problems directly. Armando, do you perhaps see any direct
22 problems ppc-macos will get when using the gnustep ebuilds?
23
24
25 --
26 Fabian Groffen
27 Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
28 --
29 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] Followup to: The road ahead? dirk.schoenberger@×××××××××.de