| 1 |
Ok, with shame I think I can say I learned something. Since progressive |
| 2 |
inherits from macos I consider it to be wrong to have collision-protect |
| 3 |
USE flags in the macos/use.mask file. Instead they should go into the |
| 4 |
macos/10.[34]/use.mask files. I corrected this issue already in CVS. |
| 5 |
If someone still has some nice comment on this, please say so. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Grobian wrote: |
| 8 |
> Ok, so I found that there is |
| 9 |
> profiles/default-darwin/macos/package.mask |
| 10 |
> and |
| 11 |
> profiles/default-darwin/macos/10.3/package.mask |
| 12 |
> profiles/default-darwin/macos/10.4/package.mask |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> all three included nano before my commit. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> profiles/default-darwin/macos/package.mask contained a version numbered |
| 17 |
> nano, the 10.3 and 10.4 profiles a generic nano mask (ie. it always |
| 18 |
> collides). |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> What's the difference here exactly? And why isn't the macos one used |
| 21 |
> for packages that are evil on OSX *any version*, and the 10.4 and 10.3 |
| 22 |
> ones for more selective stuff? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I might miss something here, but if I don't I'd like to move all common |
| 25 |
> stuff in 10.4 and 10.3 down to macos, as it greatly improves readability |
| 26 |
> and greatly improves the use of the great inheritance structure provided |
| 27 |
> by the profiles... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 31 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives