Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Lina Pezzella <J4rg0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:25:54
Message-Id: FBA7D0DA-D4BF-402D-9AB7-E18F0B6918CB@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead? by Grobian
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5 On Oct 30, 2005, at 5:49 AM, Grobian wrote:
6
7 If you want, I can re-enable the imlate script on my server. I
8 stopped it because I was under the impression that keeping up with
9 x86 was just not feasible for us. Perhaps this should wait until we
10 have prefixed installs?
11
12 For now, I think our best efforts (in terms of packages, not portage)
13 would be to increase upstream support for Darwin/Mac OS X. The more
14 we submit packages upstream, the more likely it is that future
15 versions of things will work without us tweaking them. That way, we
16 spend a bit more time initially fixing things, but we ultimately fix
17 it once.
18
19 - --Lina Pezzella
20 Gentoo Developer
21
22
23
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
26
27 iD8DBQFDZarJNJ9STR9DbYERAh4sAJ41Sp72VXda6zDQPDwxGcfcHbZewwCgzG9t
28 XrrBBf+1BGPeLhrcky4ATwE=
29 =ECpR
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 --
32 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead? Grobian <grobian@g.o>