| 1 |
On 30. Jul 2005, at 20:33 Uhr, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Is there still something goin on? This ML seems to be very quiet. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> There is definitely stuff going on! Unfortunately, not much is |
| 6 |
> documented. Assuming that you want to stay on top of more than just |
| 7 |
> what new packages have been keyworded (you can use the great services |
| 8 |
> at http://packages.gentoo.org or the like for that), There are two |
| 9 |
> ways to keep track of the project status. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
My problem always was, i felt a bit uncomfortable with gentoo changing |
| 12 |
my OS X files. For example have used gnat for OS X as an external |
| 13 |
package, not from gentoo, which changed my gcc 3.3 that came with OS X |
| 14 |
and that demaged my gcc, it took very long to find out why some things |
| 15 |
did not compile. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
so i like the fink solution, to have an extra directory, which i can |
| 18 |
simply remove if i don't like it anymore or that i can simply change my |
| 19 |
PATH to have an origial OS X environment. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Some time ago there was a discussion about those things, which way |
| 22 |
gentoo-osx should go, what to do and so. What about this discussion? Is |
| 23 |
the extra directory for gentoo-osx definetly dead and will not be used? |
| 24 |
Or are the changes to portage that would be neccessary to difficult? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
Philipp |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives