1 |
On Oct 12, 2005, at 2:09 AM, Mike S wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> I am also inclined to wait for the next release for prefix support |
5 |
> which opens up a few new tricks that I am familiar with. Also Tony |
6 |
> asked me, and I would like to know if there is an experimental |
7 |
> portage out there that has prefix support in it, that we could |
8 |
> compile and play with, and if not when the next release is due. |
9 |
|
10 |
Thanks to Brian Ferring, Michael Haubi, and a few others, last night |
11 |
I was able to properly bootstrap portage in a prefix for the first |
12 |
time...WOOT! No ebuilds that do anything useful, and many things are |
13 |
broken, but its a start. I hope to release a stage0 tarball for OS X |
14 |
devs very shortly, assuming I can keep Real Life and Work at bay for |
15 |
a bit :p |
16 |
|
17 |
Once we have a tarball to start from, there will either be a prefixed |
18 |
portage svn branch in the mainline module, or possibly in the alt |
19 |
repo, thats up to the portage devs as to how they want to handle |
20 |
that. Adding prefix support is anything but trivial, so the patch is |
21 |
rather large...it will be some work to stay inline with upstream for |
22 |
sure. |
23 |
|
24 |
You can find some things here in the meantime: |
25 |
|
26 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/prefix/ |
27 |
|
28 |
But its not trivial to get it going, and no docs or anything yet.... |
29 |
|
30 |
Also Mike: you might also pop into #gentoo-alt, #gentoo-portage and |
31 |
peruse the gentoo-alt@ and gentoo-portage-dev@ ML archives, as the OS |
32 |
X team isn't the only ones with a vested interest in prefixes... |
33 |
Theres a couple people working on it for things like aix as well. |
34 |
|
35 |
--Kito |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |