1 |
On 26-01-2006 21:33:17 -0600, Kito wrote: |
2 |
> On Jan 26, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Grobian wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> >On 25-01-2006 18:08:04 -0500, Nick Dimiduk wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >>started putting together a .pkg (for my own uses) based on the most |
7 |
> >>recent portage-2.1 ebuild and it occurred to me that this may not be |
8 |
> >>appropriate. I'd be happy to clean it up for general distribution. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> >Does 2.1 work properly on OSX? I have problems with 2.0.53 and up... |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Hmm? I think the problems you have are profile related, and not |
13 |
> portage. The prefix branch works fine all the way up to svn trunk. |
14 |
|
15 |
Nope, it's related to the later portage tools dropping 'hardcoded |
16 |
support' for OSX, that's why I haven't keyworded the newer version, |
17 |
because it simply generates python stack traces for some tools (not |
18 |
emerge), which I don't consider to be "good". It was deliberately not |
19 |
fixed (sort of impossible), hence deliberately not keyworded by me. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Fabian Groffen |
24 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |