1 |
On 10/31/05, Kito <kito@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Should be usable in both cases. Literally, the prefix stable patch is |
8 |
> > chunks of my 2.1 work and haubi's work torn out and integrated into |
9 |
> > 2.0 |
10 |
> > for prototype demonstration. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Those last 2 words should be stressed... don't want anyone getting |
13 |
> false ideas of whats being done here... |
14 |
|
15 |
Well, if this is "round two" (which seems kind of weird since it's |
16 |
backported from v2.1 to 2.0...). I'm interested in tracking the |
17 |
"official" version as closely as possible. Maybe I should test this |
18 |
version out on FC4. What will "round three", etc, look like (are |
19 |
there missing features, is it just testing, getting ebuilds converted, |
20 |
evangelism)? |
21 |
|
22 |
Kito- Could you please elaborate on the bootstrap process? Perhaps |
23 |
we could put it in the wiki? Regarding changes to ebuilds, yes I |
24 |
agree small (or no) changes is preferred. I went ahead and installed |
25 |
apache2 in my prefixed environment and it was relatively |
26 |
straightforward. |
27 |
|
28 |
Brian- Do you have any idea of the roadmap for prefix getting into |
29 |
portage? Would it possibly get into 2.0? 2.1? Rewrite? What will |
30 |
determine this? |
31 |
|
32 |
matt |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |