| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:50:58PM +0100, Grobian wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 27-01-2006 11:16:05 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Bug #113551 |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > Problem is IMHO that on our current setup our shells don't get the stuff |
| 6 |
> > > from portage, because the shells don't come with the gentoo rc scripts. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Err... legacy crap (yay). |
| 9 |
> > Comment regarding "won't be a problem for long"- would be nice having |
| 10 |
> > some clarification on that one :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Problem does not occur to me in prefixed portage. "long" is a relative |
| 13 |
> thing. :p |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > The tools that are broken *still* should be external to portage |
| 16 |
> > (exception is emaint). Any others, should have the hardcoded |
| 17 |
> > insertion. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Ehm, ok. When will your 'fix' be available for us? In next snapshot |
| 20 |
> release of portage 2.1? Thanks by the way. |
| 21 |
At least for emaint, commited the path insertion earlier today. |
| 22 |
You're going to need to be a bit more specific if there are others |
| 23 |
failing though. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
~harring |
Archives