Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:58:11
Message-Id: 20040313145714.68967c6a@powerix.local.c0ffeine.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by Drake Wyrm
1 On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:09:43 -0800
2 Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Fri, 2004-03-12, 21:15:40 +0200, teh_afv-13
5 > <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za> wrote:
6 > >>Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>:
7 > >>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100 Martin Zwickel
8 > >>><martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote:
9 > >>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300 Konstantin Arkhipov
10 > >>>> <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled:
11 > >>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300 Maximiliano Fern_ndez
12 > >>>>> <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote:
13 > >>>>>
14 > >>>>>> test
15 > >>>>>>
16 > >>>>> passed :)
17 > >>>>
18 > >>>> Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list...
19 > >>>
20 > >>>it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with
21 > >>>performance in gentoo ;D
22 > >>
23 > >>:) keep it that way :)
24 > > Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0?
25 > >
26 > > Would make some interesting reading.
27 >
28 > Way to take the fun out of a perfectly irrelevant conversation. :P
29
30 Uhm.
31
32
33 --
34 (o_ Markus Nigbur
35 //\ Gentoo Linux Developer
36 [ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org