Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:58:11
Message-Id: 20040313145714.68967c6a@powerix.local.c0ffeine.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by Drake Wyrm
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:09:43 -0800
Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-03-12, 21:15:40 +0200, teh_afv-13 > <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za> wrote: > >>Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>: > >>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100 Martin Zwickel > >>><martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300 Konstantin Arkhipov > >>>> <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled: > >>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300 Maximiliano Fern_ndez > >>>>> <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> test > >>>>>> > >>>>> passed :) > >>>> > >>>> Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list... > >>> > >>>it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with > >>>performance in gentoo ;D > >> > >>:) keep it that way :) > > Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0? > > > > Would make some interesting reading. > > Way to take the fun out of a perfectly irrelevant conversation. :P
Uhm. -- (o_ Markus Nigbur //\ Gentoo Linux Developer [ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org