From: | Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-performance@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | ||
Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:22 | ||
Message-Id: | 921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? by Joel Merrick |
1 | On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 | > Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal |
3 | > performance DB? |
4 | > |
5 | What? |
6 | |
7 | > b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the |
8 | > entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc.. |
9 | |
10 | Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific |
11 | *performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the |
12 | mistery? |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | Thomas Lasswell <lasswellt@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> |