Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:02:17
Message-Id: 20040313060943.GD26415@phaenix.haell.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by teh_afv-13
On Fri, 2004-03-12, 21:15:40 +0200, teh_afv-13 <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za>
wrote:
>>Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>: >>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100 Martin Zwickel >>><martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300 Konstantin Arkhipov >>>> <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled: >>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300 Maximiliano Fern_ndez >>>>> <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> test >>>>>> >>>>> passed :) >>>> >>>> Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list... >>> >>>it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with >>>performance in gentoo ;D >> >>:) keep it that way :) > Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0? > > Would make some interesting reading.
Way to take the fun out of a perfectly irrelevant conversation. :P -- Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell -- gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] test Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o>