1 |
Hi.. |
2 |
|
3 |
Your experience Daniel it is so good, I the company what I work have the |
4 |
SunFire V440 with CentOS and It is so bad, so bad, actually one of the most |
5 |
important problamens what we have is : |
6 |
|
7 |
One day the company page can not be accessed from anywahere, including the |
8 |
same company, and the apache (httpd), network services seems to be fine, we |
9 |
probing so many things, the last what we try was restart al services related |
10 |
with networking, and guess what, the problem was resolved. Looking in the |
11 |
web for causes of the problem, I read in a web CentOS have so problems, |
12 |
CentOS sometimes said "the service es OK" but that is not true. |
13 |
|
14 |
Few days later we (thecnicians) have a meeting to talk about the problem, |
15 |
and we decide migrate to gentoo, when the deparment coordinator talk with |
16 |
the boss, the boss said NO! gentoo NO!, because CentOS it is more |
17 |
productive, and gentoo is so much dificult to configure and our cordinator |
18 |
said "no boss it is not true" and the boss said "this is my last word". |
19 |
|
20 |
I think what the boss decision is no good because Gentoo it is better, much |
21 |
better in many ways. |
22 |
|
23 |
What I want with all that?... Have any people in the list some experiences |
24 |
with this kind of migrate? somebody can tell me about your experience? |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks in advance and regards.. |
27 |
|
28 |
Note : Excuse me for my english, I am learning... Thanks and Excuses... Have |
29 |
a nice day |
30 |
|
31 |
On 4/29/07, Guillaume Ceccarelli <lastrainson@×××××.com> wrote: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> I have to agree with Daniel here. This list is very low traffic. If you |
34 |
> want to reach a broad part of the gentoo community, I think the Gentoo |
35 |
> forums could be the way to go. ( http://forums.gentoo.org ). As for the |
36 |
> performance tests, I don't think either that the server world would give you |
37 |
> a lot of differences in terms of performance whether you're using Gentoo or |
38 |
> a popular server-oriented binary distro. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Just my 2 cents... |
41 |
> |
42 |
> On 4/29/07, Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se> wrote: |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > > Quite frankly, I'd be surprised if a Gentoo server was significantly |
45 |
> > > faster than a CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 clone) server on a high-intensity |
46 |
> > > server workload. But I have tried a lot of distros for scientific |
47 |
> > > workstations, and Gentoo does seem to have an advantage there. |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > I would have to agree. The performance gains in Gentoo tend to (In the |
50 |
> > Real World(tm) ) come from not having a bunch of crap instaled an |
51 |
> > running that hogs memory rather than from using a particular set of |
52 |
> > optimizing flags. Further, real-word servers ten to be built with some |
53 |
> > performance margin in order to handle load spikes, so a few percent |
54 |
> > here and there wouldn't really be measurable, assuming you compare to a |
55 |
> > system that isn't bloated. |
56 |
> > |
57 |
> > Further,this list has averaged at about one post per month since around |
58 |
> > 2003 when I joined, so don't expect to gett too many replies from here. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > --DA |
61 |
> > |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> |
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
Francisco Rivas |