From: | Stephan Feder <sf@×××××.de> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-performance@g.o | ||
Cc: | jesse@×××××××××××.net | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-performance] Re: tmpfs Questions | ||
Date: | Mon, 12 May 2003 17:07:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 3EBFD79B.5A7101BE@b-i-t.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-performance] tmpfs Questions by MAL |
1 | MAL wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Jesse Jacobs wrote: |
4 | > > I've read about a deadlock condition. |
5 | > > What would constitute a oversive tmpfs? |
6 | > > I thought anything unable to be allocated would be paged out to swap. |
7 | > |
8 | > No, if you run out of tmpfs, that's it.. you're out of disk space.. it |
9 | > wont use swap to emulate disk space. |
10 | ... |
11 | |
12 | Not true. tmpfs lives in virtual memory, not physical memory only. |
13 | |
14 | Regards, |
15 | Stephan |
16 | |
17 | -- |
18 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-performance] Re: tmpfs Questions | MAL <mal@×××××××.com> |