| 1 |
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0200 |
| 2 |
Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi list! |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance |
| 7 |
> implications? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> To be more specific: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network |
| 12 |
> services and the company I work for uses some of their (Intranet web |
| 13 |
> and file) servers for high performance computing. Would using stuff |
| 14 |
> like PaX reduce, for example, memory allocation, memory access and |
| 15 |
> context switching? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Never mind, just found this myself: |
| 18 |
http://www.pjvenda.org/linux/doc/pax-performance/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Quote:"AMD64, PPC64, Alpha and other architectures benefit with PaX's |
| 21 |
PAGEEXEC memory protection at no cost whatsoever!" |
Archives