| 1 |
Using -O3 has the potential to create large binaries that would occupy a |
| 2 |
good amount of RAM, and there's a lot of question to whether or not the |
| 3 |
binaries are actually faster on modern computers. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:52 -0300, Guillermo Ramhorst wrote: |
| 6 |
> Jonathan Smith wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 9 |
> >Hash: SHA1 |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> >Adam Petaccia wrote: |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >>For responsiveness, I'd recommend the -ck kernel. Its tuned for desktop |
| 15 |
> >>interactivity. ANd I hate to start a CFLAG war, but you say things are |
| 16 |
> >>slow when switching windows, which means some stuff may be going in and |
| 17 |
> >>out of swap...You didn't compile with the -O3 flag did you? |
| 18 |
> >> |
| 19 |
> >> |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> >i find that -O2 or -Os work well. -O3 just makes the programs too |
| 23 |
> >freaking big |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> >- -- |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> >smithj |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> >Gentoo Developer |
| 30 |
> >[ desktop-misc && netmon && documentation ] |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> >iD8DBQFCxFm8l5AvwDPiUowRAhFrAKCcRIOvZSX6Cm2RofYnjct6SrR8hACfW701 |
| 38 |
> >sectgmXz6CofHfey/idAw8g= |
| 39 |
> >=Vs6s |
| 40 |
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 41 |
> > |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> Well, I think we have something here... I _did_ used -O3... so perhaps |
| 44 |
> the key is -O2?? |
| 45 |
> ..and (I'm jumping to the floor to avoid being shot) I've been using a |
| 46 |
> 3x RAM swap space that was defined by a previous Ubuntu install... |
| 47 |
> perhaps I should resize it to 2x RAM? |
| 48 |
> Tks again, Willy. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
Adam Petaccia <adam@×××××××××.com> |
Archives