Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: teh_afv-13 <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:13:51
Message-Id: opr4rjsegiarpx05@smtp.telkomsa.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by maartenlameris@zonnet.nl
Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0?

Would make some interesting reading.

> :) keep it that way :) > > Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>: > >> it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with performance >> in gentoo ;D >> >> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100 >> Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote: >> >> > >> > Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list... >> > >> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300 >> > Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled: >> > >> > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300 >> > > Maximiliano Fern_ndez <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote: >> > > >> > > > test >> > > > >> > > passed :) >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > MyExcuse: >> > The salesman drove over the CPU board. >> > >> > Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> >> > Research & Development >> > >> > TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de> >> > >> >> >> -- >> voxus >> :wq >> >> -- >> gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
-- gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] test Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>