Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: teh_afv-13 <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:13:51
Message-Id: opr4rjsegiarpx05@smtp.telkomsa.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by maartenlameris@zonnet.nl
1 Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0?
2
3 Would make some interesting reading.
4
5 > :) keep it that way :)
6 >
7 > Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>:
8 >
9 >> it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with performance
10 >> in gentoo ;D
11 >>
12 >> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100
13 >> Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote:
14 >>
15 >> >
16 >> > Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list...
17 >> >
18 >> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300
19 >> > Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled:
20 >> >
21 >> > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300
22 >> > > Maximiliano Fern_ndez <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote:
23 >> > >
24 >> > > > test
25 >> > > >
26 >> > > passed :)
27 >> > >
28 >> >
29 >> >
30 >> > --
31 >> > MyExcuse:
32 >> > The salesman drove over the CPU board.
33 >> >
34 >> > Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de>
35 >> > Research & Development
36 >> >
37 >> > TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
38 >> >
39 >>
40 >>
41 >> --
42 >> voxus
43 >> :wq
44 >>
45 >> --
46 >> gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
47
48 --
49 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] test Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>