| 1 |
I recommend using your home server as a build server and hosting the |
| 2 |
portage tree there for the other clients to (auto)mount via NFS. |
| 3 |
There's some docs in the wiki on how to do this. It will free you of |
| 4 |
the need to be concerned about a separate portage partition on each of |
| 5 |
these other machines. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Brian |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Mikko Husari wrote: |
| 10 |
> Daniel Armyr kirjoitti: |
| 11 |
>>> i was wonderin, what kind of partition + fs table would be |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> optimal on server and/or desktop. What are you planning on using the |
| 14 |
>> computer for? And when will you |
| 15 |
>> need the rapid disk access that raid0 gives you? --DA |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> Well, it is just for sake of wondering, and it would not hurt to have |
| 20 |
> the speediest system ever, even if i would ever need it. That |
| 21 |
> server/desktop part means that i have desktop computers and one home |
| 22 |
> server. It also means that id like to know if the setup would be |
| 23 |
> different. The kind of stuff im wondering is, what should reside on |
| 24 |
> separate disks to receive any system speedup, even in theory. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Archives