1 |
I have to agree with Daniel here. This list is very low traffic. If you want |
2 |
to reach a broad part of the gentoo community, I think the Gentoo forums |
3 |
could be the way to go. ( http://forums.gentoo.org ). As for the performance |
4 |
tests, I don't think either that the server world would give you a lot of |
5 |
differences in terms of performance whether you're using Gentoo or a popular |
6 |
server-oriented binary distro. |
7 |
|
8 |
Just my 2 cents... |
9 |
|
10 |
On 4/29/07, Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se> wrote: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > Quite frankly, I'd be surprised if a Gentoo server was significantly |
13 |
> > faster than a CentOS 5 (RHEL 5 clone) server on a high-intensity |
14 |
> > server workload. But I have tried a lot of distros for scientific |
15 |
> > workstations, and Gentoo does seem to have an advantage there. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I would have to agree. The performance gains in Gentoo tend to (In the |
18 |
> Real World(tm) ) come from not having a bunch of crap instaled an |
19 |
> running that hogs memory rather than from using a particular set of |
20 |
> optimizing flags. Further, real-word servers ten to be built with some |
21 |
> performance margin in order to handle load spikes, so a few percent |
22 |
> here and there wouldn't really be measurable, assuming you compare to a |
23 |
> system that isn't bloated. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Further,this list has averaged at about one post per month since around |
26 |
> 2003 when I joined, so don't expect to gett too many replies from here. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> --DA |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |