From: | Mikko Husari <husku@×××××.net> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-performance@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-performance] Optimal fstab on raid |
Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:53:02 |
Message-Id: | 45C76E51.3090202@husku.net |
1 | hi! |
2 | |
3 | i was wonderin, what kind of partition + fs table would be optimal on |
4 | server and/or desktop. afaik, /usr/portage would be on its own |
5 | partition, and perhaps reiserfs and raid0. distfiles should be on a |
6 | different partition, so it would not be in the way of portage itself... |
7 | but, what about other parts of gentoo/linux. and is raid0+reiserfs just |
8 | begging for trouble? |
9 | -- |
10 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
SV: [gentoo-performance] Optimal fstab on raid | Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se> |