Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] inline considered harmful
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:30:42
Message-Id: 1090535434.10643.14.camel@rattus.Localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] inline considered harmful by William Kenworthy
1 ach, replying to oneself
2
3 the -march of course changes to the processor you are running it on. I
4 really should redo this as I now run an athlon-XP which is a different
5 beast to the previous lot, even though the flags seemed to come up
6 similar for them.
7
8 I also know a lot more now so I might try approaching it differently ...
9
10 BillK
11
12 On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 06:23, William Kenworthy wrote:
13 > A while back I ran a large number of tests on optimisations across an
14 > athlon t-bird 1.4g, pentium4M (dell laptop) and a cyrix 200 (for fun!).
15 > The applications were scientific, some home scripts and gimp
16 > manipulations.
17
18
19
20 --
21 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list