| 1 |
This sounds like a great idea, there's always things people contribute |
| 2 |
performance wise, and there's a ton of information on tweaks that |
| 3 |
people like to implement, although there's no real place to post them. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
As Joel said, a performance database would be good also, there is |
| 6 |
already a project I believe for compile times, a good performance |
| 7 |
database would be a good idea, however there would have to be made a |
| 8 |
benchmarking tool, and other things that would have to be standardized |
| 9 |
for that to work. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A forum would be an easy solution for performance modifications and |
| 12 |
tweaks, and would be a great addition. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
--Tom |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:17 +0000, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 18 |
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 19 |
> > Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal |
| 20 |
> > performance DB? |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> What? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the |
| 25 |
> > entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc.. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific |
| 28 |
> *performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the |
| 29 |
> mistery? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Thomas Lasswell |
| 41 |
http://www.graphinesystems.com |
| 42 |
tom@×××××××××××××××.com |
| 43 |
lasswellt@×××××.com |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Archives