Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-performance
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: gentoo-performance@g.o
From: Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: portage performance
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:22:03 -0400
On Saturday 12 June 2004 4:19 pm, Sri Gupta wrote:
> Try using a JIT-style python compiler.
> #emerge psyco
> #nano -w `which emerge`

The first problem with this is that it's architecture-specific.  (think in 
terms of Java Runtime Environments and this will make sense). 

You will notice that psyco is available only on x86.  Also Psyco only looks 
for stuff it knows how to optimize, which are some selective operations.  
In theory someday it will optimize more, and be available on more 
architectures, but that doesn't really buy Gentoo much today... since it's 
totally locked in on x86.

Psyco does improve speed somewhat, as it relates to Portage anyway, but 
nothing substantial.  Psyco is noticeable in situations where there are a 
lot of complicated loops that cycle many times over at least a few minutes 
(when running in normal interpreted mode).  The better improvements will 
come from optimizing the algorithms, not tweaking the runtime.

Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o]
Public Key:

gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

portage performance
-- Jesse Guardiani
Re: portage performance
-- Jerry McBride
Re: Re: portage performance
-- Sri Gupta
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: portage performance
Next by thread:
Re: Re: portage performance
Previous by date:
Re: Re: portage performance
Next by date:
How is it possible ???

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-performance mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.