Archives
Archives
| From: | Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-performance@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? by Joel Merrick |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal |
| 3 | > performance DB? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | What? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the |
| 8 | > entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc.. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific |
| 11 | *performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the |
| 12 | mistery? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | Thomas Lasswell <lasswellt@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? | Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> |