Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-performance
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: gentoo-performance@g.o
From: Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@...>
Subject: Re: portage performance
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:02:53 -0400
Jesse Guardiani wrote:

> Hello,
> First off, sorry if this isn't the right place!
> I didn't see anything more appropriate though, except
> perhaps Portage-dev, but I'm not a developer.
> I'm a FreeBSD user switching to Gentoo for my home
> system. Linux 2.6 is a LOT more stable than any
> FreeBSD 5.x-RELEASE kernels right now, and Linux
> has much better support for Wine and such.
> One of the most obvious differences between FreeBSD
> ports and Gentoo Portage is how LONG it takes to
> search for ports/packages with Portage.
> I have 525 ports installed on my FreeBSD laptop right
> now, and probably only half of that installed on the
> Gentoo machine, but the gentoo machine crunches a lot
> more doing a --search than the FreeBSD machine does
> with a pkg_version -vs 'name'.
> And forget about --searchdesc! That takes ages!
> Is portage not hash indexed or something?

The main problem is this.... the portage database is a file system based
mechanism. That is to say, when you update, search or otherwise use emerge,
the program is busy as hell leafing through thousands of files looking for
what you want..

"Hashed", "indexed"??? Not even close....

Portage is begging for a decent database engine and I pray it's sql

The other hitch is that portage is written in an interpreted language,
Python. Python is an excellent programming language, no doubt about it, but
performance isn't one of it's highlights. Moving portage to C would be so
much better....


                     Registered Linux User Number 185956
              FSF Associate Member number 2340 since 05/20/2004
             Join me in chat at #linux-users on
    Buy an Xbox for $149.00, run linux on it and Microsoft loses $150.00!
    10:50pm  up 53 days,  1:32,  6 users,  load average: 3.07, 2.99, 2.93

gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Re: portage performance
-- Jesse Guardiani
Re: Re: portage performance
-- Sri Gupta
Re: Re: portage performance
-- Paul de Vrieze
portage performance
-- Jesse Guardiani
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: portage performance
Next by thread:
Re: Re: portage performance
Previous by date:
Re: portage performance
Next by date:
Re: Re: portage performance

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-performance mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.