Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?

[Joel Merrick]

Daniel Armyr wrote:

>Which parameters do you intend on including?
>Only hardware or kernel-configs as well? Compiler flags?
>Hardware settings?
>
>

All to be honest, include as many fields as possible, but not make them 
compulsary

Please help me elaborate if possible

Here's the current list..

_Hardware Specifics_

Architecture
CPU
Motherboard
Bus Speed
Clock Speed
RAM Type
RAM Amount
RAM Speed
Video Card Type
Video Card RAM Amount
Video Card RAM Speed

_Build and Environment Specifics_

CFLAGS
LDFLAGS
etc

_Kernel Specifics_

Kernel Type & Version (from Vanilla)
Kernel Patchsets (gentoo, ck, love, nitro etc..)
Build date
Other Parameters
PLUS MAYBE AN OPTION TO UPLOAD YOUR .config??!!
etc

_Sys Specifics_

sysctl tuning
Other tuning

_X Specifics_

Xfree/Xorg version
USE flags used to compile?

_HD Specifics_

hdparm settings
RAID?
What RAID Level?

_BENCHMARKS!!_

It may be best to define what the delegated system task is.. I mean, 
it's no point running Xfbench for a non-X server, of course!

Plus games would prefer graphics and systems benchmarkis, rather than a 
DB benchmark..

There's a lot of software out there, that benchmark a lot of programs 
and a lot of subsystems!


Plus maybe percieved performace increases, like prelinking, editing 
boot-up scripts etc..



I'm sure there's a lot of points of contention there, plus a hell of a 
lot I've missed out...

Feel free to rip apart at will.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joel Merrick [mailto:joel@×××××××××××.com]
>Sent: den 12 oktober 2004 12:39
>To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
>
>
>Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Roman Gaufman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-performance forum
>>>section, so performance related threads wont have to go to "Other
>>>Things Gentoo". Your thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I just chatted with one of the forums admins and he said that we won't
>>be adding any new forums until phpBB 2.2 is released. Thats mainly
>>because managing with the current version is a major PITA from what I
>>hear. *BUT* That doesn't mean that you'll see this forum created. The
>>forums are currently structured more in a "task/purpose than by goal"
>>way. So, having a goal of performance wouldn't really fit the structure
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>we have right now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Just to let you peeps now, I've been thinking about this last night and
>I'd love it if there was just a (simple) form where people could enter
>their system credentials and benchmark results.
>
>I'm going to do a little bit of investigation tonight in terms of
>looking at standardised benchmarks.. I believe, from a bit of searching,
>
>that the whole arena of benchmarking is a big mamma!
>
>Wish me luck! If I get anything that looks like a go-er, I'll fire a
>(probably crap) PHP page together, where people can input their system
>specifics... and list them in a grid-matrix kinda view (it'd be a bit
>easier to read than just forum posts i.m.h.o. and may provide a decent
>intermediate until someone works out a MUCH clever system, lol)
>
>Does anyone know if there's anything like this for other distros
>(although due to Gentoo's lurvely package build system, I doubt we'd be
>able to draw true comparisons)
>
>Sorry if i'm rambling.... heh.
>
>--
>gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
>
>
>
>
>--
>gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
>
>
>


--
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list