1 |
Using -O3 has the potential to create large binaries that would occupy a |
2 |
good amount of RAM, and there's a lot of question to whether or not the |
3 |
binaries are actually faster on modern computers. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:52 -0300, Guillermo Ramhorst wrote: |
6 |
> Jonathan Smith wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
9 |
> >Hash: SHA1 |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> >Adam Petaccia wrote: |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> >>For responsiveness, I'd recommend the -ck kernel. Its tuned for desktop |
15 |
> >>interactivity. ANd I hate to start a CFLAG war, but you say things are |
16 |
> >>slow when switching windows, which means some stuff may be going in and |
17 |
> >>out of swap...You didn't compile with the -O3 flag did you? |
18 |
> >> |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> >i find that -O2 or -Os work well. -O3 just makes the programs too |
23 |
> >freaking big |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> >- -- |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> >smithj |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> >Gentoo Developer |
30 |
> >[ desktop-misc && netmon && documentation ] |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
34 |
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
35 |
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> >iD8DBQFCxFm8l5AvwDPiUowRAhFrAKCcRIOvZSX6Cm2RofYnjct6SrR8hACfW701 |
38 |
> >sectgmXz6CofHfey/idAw8g= |
39 |
> >=Vs6s |
40 |
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> Well, I think we have something here... I _did_ used -O3... so perhaps |
44 |
> the key is -O2?? |
45 |
> ..and (I'm jumping to the floor to avoid being shot) I've been using a |
46 |
> 3x RAM swap space that was defined by a previous Ubuntu install... |
47 |
> perhaps I should resize it to 2x RAM? |
48 |
> Tks again, Willy. |
49 |
> |
50 |
-- |
51 |
Adam Petaccia <adam@×××××××××.com> |