| 1 |
>and searching from portage over nfs is much slower than searching |
| 2 |
local portage tree... |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
True, but then you allways do all searches using esearch, (or eix, |
| 5 |
but I never used that) and in that case you do the search from |
| 6 |
some form of preindexed database that resides locally. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As to the original question, a raid0 will naturally be |
| 9 |
theoretically faster when reading several small files |
| 10 |
simultaneously. But depending on bandwidth of your HD-controller, |
| 11 |
writing might (in theory) be slower if you don't have |
| 12 |
HW-accellerated RAID. |
| 13 |
--DA |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
Archives