Roman Gaufman wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@...> wrote:
>  
>
>>Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal
>>performance DB?
>>
>>    
>>
>What?
>  
>

A 'proper' database that contains your hardware, architecture, 
optimization flags, hdparm, kernel & tuning, phase of the moon, mother's 
horroscope ;)

You know what I mean! Not just a mish-mash of forum posts. ;)

>  
>
>>b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the
>>entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc..
>>    
>>
>
>Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific
>*performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the
>mistery?
>
>  
>

Sorry, I never took these to be 'issues', only an aid to assessing your 
systems performance against others... where IS the mistery? I can't find it?

Re-read the original post..

1) CFLAGS
2) LDFLAGS
3) Acovea
4) FS benchmarks
5) Raid benchmarks
6) Random performance patches like modifying /etc/init.d
7) Random sysctrl settings
8) Hdparm settings
9) Random hard drive benchmarks
10) Any other tips like nfs configuration.


Err... where's the hardware?

It *might* be important to know.. appologies if this was noted in a prior mail to this, but that's why I asked the question.



>--
>gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
>
>  
>


--
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list