Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: lnxg33k <lnxg33k@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] gentoo-performance (sync speedups)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:05:53
Message-Id: 43D18876.6080304@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] gentoo-performance (sync speedups) by Alec Warner
1 Alec Warner wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > lnxg33k wrote:
6 >> Thanks Alec Warner for the great explanation. It still seems like by not
7 >> having portions of the tree by using EXCLUDEFORM and deleting the local
8 >> dirs that you'd save some time in the --metadata part of sync as less
9 >> ebuilds are available to be checked. Is this simply a wrong misconception?
10 >
11 > The portion that "updates metadata cache" has nothing to do with what
12 > ebuilds are in the tree. It simply takes the server-side caches (
13 > pregenerated ) and sync them into your local cache. You could RSYNC
14 > exclude the whole tree and this will still happen for every package,
15 > since the metadata is generated on the server ( and the server has the
16 > whole tree ).
17 >
18 > Now if you were to rsync exclude metadata/ you would reduce the
19 > - --metadata portion...because it wouldn't happen ;)
20 >
21 <snip>
22
23 Ah, ok. Hearing it again makes it sound more reasonable. I'll have to watch my
24 rsync output a bit more closely. Thanks again for the explanation.
25 --
26 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list