Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-performance
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>As a side note, I do such things (Linux capacity planning) for a living
>and am rather unlikely to deliver major quantities of valuable advice
>for free. Perhaps there is someone in the original poster's part of the
>world who would, though.
>
>
>
Thanks
>Anthony Gorecki wrote:
>
>
>
>>(apologies if this is delivered twice)
>>
>>Geisel,
>>
>>It's unlikely that someone would take the time to analyze your new computer
>>system and make blind suggestions. You'd have better luck asking a specific
>>question, preferably after doing some research of your own. See
>>http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>>
>>
>>Secondly, extracting some header information from your message:
>>
>>X-Filtering-Reason: No text/plain message body was present.
>>X-Filtering-Reason: The message contained data that was of an illegal content
>>type.
>>X-Karma: -2
>>
>>
>>and after briefly scanning your message (in unrendered markup form), here are
>>a few suggestions:
>>
>>- Send your mail in plain text format. Many of the Gentoo developers and users
>>on this mailing list can read HTML text without having it rendered, but
>>they're more likely to simply send your message on an instantaneous trip to
>>the trash; many mail filters will do this automatically (mine included).
>>
>>- Don't waste message space by sending virtual business cards (the "illegal
>>content type" mentioned in the second filtering header). If you need to
>>provide information about yourself, add a web address to your signature; save
>>us the trouble of looking at data that's of no interest. If someone wants
>>more information, they'll search the web or visit the website that you've
>>listed in your signature.
>>
>>- Be concise. Basic information about the computer is useful. A raw dump of
>>data, spanning your entire device subsystem, is not. This is also, from a
>>security standpoint, potentially unwise.
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|