Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-performance
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-performance@g.o
From: William Kenworthy <billk@...>
Subject: Re: inline considered harmful
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:30:34 +0800
ach, replying to oneself

the -march of course changes to the processor you are running it on.  I
really should redo this as I now run an athlon-XP which is a different
beast to the previous lot, even though the flags seemed to come up
similar for them.

I also know a lot more now so I might try approaching it differently ...

BillK

On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 06:23, William Kenworthy wrote:
> A while back I ran a large number of tests on optimisations across an
> athlon t-bird 1.4g, pentium4M (dell laptop) and a cyrix 200 (for fun!). 
> The applications were scientific, some home scripts and gimp
> manipulations.



--
gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

References:
inline considered harmful
-- Mario Domenech Goulart
Re: inline considered harmful
-- Ervin NĂ©meth
Re: inline considered harmful
-- Bart Alewijnse
Re: inline considered harmful
-- Jerry McBride
Re: inline considered harmful
-- William Kenworthy
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-performance: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: inline considered harmful
Next by thread:
swap?
Previous by date:
Re: inline considered harmful
Next by date:
Re: Re: portage performance


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-performance mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.