1 |
Still a good idea - was more on the horizon type idea (not this week). But |
2 |
your right, changing now is better than later :) |
3 |
|
4 |
While we're at changing though - do we want to consider a different dir |
5 |
structure? Like a bin/ man/ lib? set of dirs to store in? How does svn handle |
6 |
branching? (or do we even need to worry about branching?) I only ask because |
7 |
the tarball I push up when this is in portage has a bin/ and man/ (well, you |
8 |
know, for the script and the man page...duh...sorry...) and I wasn't sure if |
9 |
there was anything like that we should be doing on the back end (not burning |
10 |
on this one - i'm easy either way, just thought I'd throw it out there if |
11 |
dirs were going to get moved around anyway). |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
On Thursday 12 May 2005 08:14 am, antoine.raillon@××××.com wrote: |
15 |
> dunno if this idea is still around, is it ? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> in case it is, we could use the same SVN as now, but then the 'gcpan' name |
18 |
> would be obsolete. changing it now would be easy, while waiting will give |
19 |
> more work ;p |
20 |
> |
21 |
> change / not change ? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> speak now or never ;) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> cab |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
31 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
32 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
33 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |