1 |
Sorry for the delay in responding - done gallivanting across the continent now :) |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:02:44 +0100 |
4 |
Chisel Wright <chisel@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I wasn't blaming you. |
7 |
|
8 |
No worries even if you had :) |
9 |
|
10 |
> Are ebuuilders only officially allowed to add the ~amd64 keyword if |
11 |
> they've actually tested it on an amd64? |
12 |
|
13 |
yep. In theory I can get access to an amd64, but time constraints for me are tight right now (trying to clean up existing bugs before potentially adding new ones ;) |
14 |
|
15 |
> It seems really daft for perl-only modules to be x86 but not amd64, and |
16 |
> slightly daft for xs-based perl-modules. |
17 |
|
18 |
I know, and it is, but its a global policy, not just a dev-perl/* one. |
19 |
|
20 |
> *sigh* |
21 |
I hear ya |
22 |
|
23 |
-mike |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |