1 |
As most of you are probably aware, the gnome team has decided to remove |
2 |
gnome-1 from the tree because it is a drain on their resources to support (my |
3 |
wording for it). While I can sympathize and understand the argument, we |
4 |
(perl) have more than a few modules/apps that rely on this gnome-1 support to |
5 |
function. A few Gentoo developers, such as spyderous, have offered to |
6 |
continue to support gnome-1 to help keep their apps alive, and have asked if |
7 |
we would like to be a part of that. Rather than arbitrarily say yes all on my |
8 |
lonesome (since we all know my hard core c/c++ skills are lacking), I'd like |
9 |
to ask your opinions. Just to give a brief sample, we're talking about |
10 |
packages like gtk-perl, glade-perl (which would be moved under gtk-perl per a |
11 |
pending bug, but I didn't see the point in pursuing that while gtk-perl was |
12 |
package.masked), bins, and the associated modules. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
|
16 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
17 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
18 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
19 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
20 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
21 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
22 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |