| 1 |
Why do you not build perl from overlay? Why did you copy and rename |
| 2 |
ebuild? It's really strange. Just add the perl-experimental overlay |
| 3 |
unmask 5.10 and install it as you do with any other package. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Sergiy Borodych wrote: |
| 6 |
> Hi ALL, |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm try some days ago a new perl 5.10.1 RC2 on ~amd64 |
| 9 |
> Get perl-5.10.0-r2 ebuild from perl-experimental |
| 10 |
> I rename it and copy all patches. |
| 11 |
> Some patches don't applied, |
| 12 |
> but I disabled them and install ok. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> After that run perl-cleaner (fixed version) |
| 15 |
> and rebuild all |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Now I have all worked. |
| 18 |
> Tested with preferred applications (like gmb) |
| 19 |
> and some my scripts - all work like a sharm. |
| 20 |
> But mod_perl not tested yet. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> So my question: |
| 23 |
> What patches (from disabled by me) are critical ? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I disabled patches: |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> 903_all_picdl.patch.bkp |
| 28 |
> 906_all_5.8.7-MakeMaker-RUNPATH.patch.bkp |
| 29 |
> 922_all_CVE-2008-2827.patch.bkp |
| 30 |
> 923_all_cleanup-paths.patch.bkp |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> What of them I need reedit ? |
| 33 |
> |
Archives