Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Yuval Yaari <yyuval@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] Adding perl-core/Encode?
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:23:38
Message-Id: 43C3ED48.8020003@checkpoint.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-perl] Adding perl-core/Encode? by Michael Cummings
Before you start unmasking, lest we forget that dev-util/svk is masked 
by itself, anyway.
Daniel, what's the big difference between Encode 2.08 and 2.10 (provided 
by perl 5.8.6 and 5.8.7 respectively, IIRC)?
Just wondering if the dependency is justified ;)

  --Yuval

Michael Cummings wrote:

>I'd prefer to unmask 5.8.7 instead if it were just up to me...especially >since 5.8.8 is looming in the next week or so according to nick > > >On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:10 -0500, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote: > > >>Hello, >> >>Before opening a bug to track this, I wanted to get some feedback. >> >>Currently dev-util/svk depends on >=dev-lang/perl-5.8.7. The only >>reason is that the version of Encode in 5.8.6 is too old. >> >>As part of bug 116331, I suggested adding perl-core/Encode and >>depending on that in dev-util/svk. Is this something the perl herd >>would consider? >> >>Thanks, >>-- >>Daniel Westermann-Clark >> >>
-- gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] Adding perl-core/Encode? Daniel Westermann-Clark <daniel@××××××××××××.net>