1 |
OK...not even a whisper, so I'm guessing I was the only perl person that liked |
2 |
having the gtk-perl bindings around. I'll go forward with the maskings :/ |
3 |
|
4 |
On Monday 20 November 2006 08:00, Michael Cummings wrote: |
5 |
> As most of you are probably aware, the gnome team has decided to remove |
6 |
> gnome-1 from the tree because it is a drain on their resources to support |
7 |
> (my wording for it). While I can sympathize and understand the argument, we |
8 |
> (perl) have more than a few modules/apps that rely on this gnome-1 support |
9 |
> to function. A few Gentoo developers, such as spyderous, have offered to |
10 |
> continue to support gnome-1 to help keep their apps alive, and have asked |
11 |
> if we would like to be a part of that. Rather than arbitrarily say yes all |
12 |
> on my lonesome (since we all know my hard core c/c++ skills are lacking), |
13 |
> I'd like to ask your opinions. Just to give a brief sample, we're talking |
14 |
> about packages like gtk-perl, glade-perl (which would be moved under |
15 |
> gtk-perl per a pending bug, but I didn't see the point in pursuing that |
16 |
> while gtk-perl was package.masked), bins, and the associated modules. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> -- |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
21 |
> Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
22 |
> Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
23 |
> Gentoo/SPARC |
24 |
> Gentoo/AMD64 |
25 |
> GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
26 |
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
31 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
32 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
33 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
34 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
35 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
36 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
37 |
|
38 |
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. |