1 |
On Sunday 03 July 2005 10:50, Michele Beltrame wrote: |
2 |
> Is this a problem in how Catalyst "announces" the missing prerequisites? |
3 |
> |
4 |
|
5 |
I suspect it is (most of those should be present as ebuilds already in portage |
6 |
at that). This all goes to one of the 2 underlying problems I have with how |
7 |
g-cpan currently detects dependancies - it doesn't note deps that are already |
8 |
installed, and it doesn't note versions of the deps. Instead it relies on |
9 |
cpan to notice the missing deps - but I'm not sure how this works if the |
10 |
module in question is using extutils::autoconfig and therefore sidestepping |
11 |
the cpan.pm detection (which I suspect happened to you in Catalyst). |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
Oh, for time and time and time to work on this :) |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
19 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
20 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
21 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |