Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-perl
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-perl@g.o
From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
Subject: Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:11:30 -0500
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 08:08 +0100, Christian Hartmann wrote:
> IIRC we decided on merging libperl and perl in the future.
> 


but then came a discussion on -dev about  how the static flag wasn't
intended for deciding whether you wanted a static or dynamic library,
which put this whole debate back into question as to whether it fit the
"rules."

-- 

-----o()o----------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net 
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7  8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
-----o()o----------------------------------------------

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Replies:
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
-- Antoine Raillon
References:
why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
-- Vadim
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
-- Christian Hartmann
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Next by thread:
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Previous by date:
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Next by date:
Re: why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-perl mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.