Still a good idea - was more on the horizon type idea (not this week). But 
your right, changing now is better than later :)

While we're at changing though - do we want to consider a different dir 
structure? Like a bin/ man/ lib? set of dirs to store in? How does svn handle 
branching? (or do we even need to worry about branching?) I only ask because 
the tarball I push up when this is in portage has a bin/ and man/ (well, you 
know, for the script and the man page...duh...sorry...) and I wasn't sure if 
there was anything like that we should be doing on the back end (not burning 
on this one - i'm easy either way, just thought I'd throw it out there if 
dirs were going to get moved around anyway).


On Thursday 12 May 2005 08:14 am, antoine.raillon@... wrote:
> dunno if this idea is still around, is it ?
>
> in case it is, we could use the same SVN as now, but then the 'gcpan' name
> would be obsolete. changing it now would be easy, while waiting will give
> more work ;p
>
> change / not change ?
>
> speak now or never ;)
>
> --
> cab

-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------