Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] g-cpan-0.14.0_rc2 feedback?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:07
Message-Id: 448EE369.1020109@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-perl] g-cpan-0.14.0_rc2 feedback? by Antoine Raillon
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Antoine Raillon wrote:
5 > Michael Cummings a écrit :
6 >> I'm figuring if anyone is using this, its the folks on this list. rc2
7 >> fixes a few minor bugs in rc1, and I haven't seen any reports of trouble
8 >> with it ('course, I need to actually look for reports too :), so I was
9 >> wondering if anyone on here had had any problems (or not). There are
10 >> some significant changes between 0.13* and 0.14*, so test the hell out
11 >> of it if you can :)
12 >>
13 > Sorry, not a lot of time to check this out (currently waiting the end of
14 > an emerge -e world, 670 packages..) but i'll asap ;)
15 >
16 > btw I'm not sure the Gentoo:: naming for packages is the best thing to
17 > do. Since these packages are tools for g-cpan, I would use something
18 > like Gentoo::gcpan::package, just in case in some future days someone
19 > creates packages using perl specifically for Gentoo but not g-cpan ;)
20 >
21 > Will add more comments later ;)
22 >
23 > ++,
24 > cab
25 >
26 rational on the gentoo:: namespace was that most of the modules are
27 *not* g-cpan specific - one to deal with the portage tree, one to deal
28 with cpan, one to deal with ebuild functions
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
31 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
32
33 iD8DBQFEjuNpq1ztTp5/Ti4RAlRXAJsHI1aTcSPghp0en0bhn7HPtjjFHQCcCUsz
34 QFhspnJ/mQeEesyTz7OuIp8=
35 =zWyl
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 --
38 gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list