-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Antoine Raillon wrote:
> Michael Cummings a écrit :
>> I'm figuring if anyone is using this, its the folks on this list. rc2
>> fixes a few minor bugs in rc1, and I haven't seen any reports of trouble
>> with it ('course, I need to actually look for reports too :), so I was
>> wondering if anyone on here had had any problems (or not). There are
>> some significant changes between 0.13* and 0.14*, so test the hell out
>> of it if you can :)
>>   
> Sorry, not a lot of time to check this out (currently waiting the end of
> an emerge -e world, 670 packages..) but i'll asap ;)
> 
> btw I'm not sure the Gentoo:: naming for packages is the best thing to
> do. Since these packages are tools for g-cpan, I would use something
> like Gentoo::gcpan::package, just in case in some future days someone
> creates packages using perl specifically for Gentoo but not g-cpan ;)
> 
> Will add more comments later ;)
> 
> ++,
> cab
> 
rational on the gentoo:: namespace was that most of the modules are
*not* g-cpan specific - one to deal with the portage tree, one to deal
with cpan, one to deal with ebuild functions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEjuNpq1ztTp5/Ti4RAlRXAJsHI1aTcSPghp0en0bhn7HPtjjFHQCcCUsz
QFhspnJ/mQeEesyTz7OuIp8=
=zWyl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list