Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-perl
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-perl@g.o
From: Yuval Yaari <yyuval@...>
Subject: Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:22:16 +0000
Before you start unmasking, lest we forget that dev-util/svk is masked 
by itself, anyway.
Daniel, what's the big difference between Encode 2.08 and 2.10 (provided 
by perl 5.8.6 and 5.8.7 respectively, IIRC)?
Just wondering if the dependency is justified ;)

  --Yuval

Michael Cummings wrote:

>I'd prefer to unmask 5.8.7 instead if it were just up to me...especially
>since 5.8.8 is looming in the next week or so according to nick
>
>
>On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:10 -0500, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Before opening a bug to track this, I wanted to get some feedback.
>>
>>Currently dev-util/svk depends on >=dev-lang/perl-5.8.7.  The only
>>reason is that the version of Encode in 5.8.6 is too old.
>>
>>As part of bug 116331, I suggested adding perl-core/Encode and
>>depending on that in dev-util/svk.  Is this something the perl herd
>>would consider?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-- 
>>Daniel Westermann-Clark
>>    
>>

-- 
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
-- Daniel Westermann-Clark
References:
Adding perl-core/Encode?
-- Daniel Westermann-Clark
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
-- Michael Cummings
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
Next by thread:
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
Previous by date:
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?
Next by date:
Re: Adding perl-core/Encode?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-perl mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.