Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
Before you start unmasking, lest we forget that dev-util/svk is masked
by itself, anyway.
Daniel, what's the big difference between Encode 2.08 and 2.10 (provided
by perl 5.8.6 and 5.8.7 respectively, IIRC)?
Just wondering if the dependency is justified ;)
--Yuval
Michael Cummings wrote:
>I'd prefer to unmask 5.8.7 instead if it were just up to me...especially
>since 5.8.8 is looming in the next week or so according to nick
>
>
>On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:10 -0500, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Before opening a bug to track this, I wanted to get some feedback.
>>
>>Currently dev-util/svk depends on >=dev-lang/perl-5.8.7. The only
>>reason is that the version of Encode in 5.8.6 is too old.
>>
>>As part of bug 116331, I suggested adding perl-core/Encode and
>>depending on that in dev-util/svk. Is this something the perl herd
>>would consider?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>--
>>Daniel Westermann-Clark
>>
>>
--
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list
|
|
