1 |
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 11:23, Antoine Raillon wrote: |
2 |
> antoine.raillon@××××××.net a écrit : |
3 |
> > Another thing : did you see *John* or some nick like that on |
4 |
> #gentoo-perl ? He said he had difficulties to build |
5 |
> Exception::Class::DBI. I tried to g-cpan -i it once, and i saw CPAN |
6 |
> directly asking me for Module-Build. I answered no to CPAN installation, |
7 |
> then g-cpan said there was already an ebuild for Module::Build and |
8 |
> started to emerge things.. I stopped it by force at this point, but I |
9 |
> think we've a source of possible mess here ;) |
10 |
|
11 |
Been a little out of sorts the last week, haven't been on irc at all really |
12 |
(sorry). The only way around this problem, really, is to either: |
13 |
* Come up with a new way of determining dependancies (which I think is in |
14 |
order anyway given that other todo/wish item i added, making sure the |
15 |
dependancy is also the met by version). Currently we let cpan unpack the |
16 |
downloaded module and do a dry run to see what deps it complains about. It's |
17 |
ugly, nasty, but works in a sick, fatalistic way. |
18 |
* Make module-build a dep for g-cpan. |
19 |
|
20 |
To resum the problem, when cpan goes to try and build the module to see what |
21 |
deps are missing, if the module uses module-build then it craps out and tries |
22 |
to install module-build, but we have an ebuild for it, hence the ugly |
23 |
situation. |
24 |
|
25 |
And all of this aside - g-cpan is still sexy and a millions times better than |
26 |
it used to be :) |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |