Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 2006-01-10 17:22:16 +0000, Yuval Yaari wrote:
> Before you start unmasking, lest we forget that dev-util/svk is
> masked by itself, anyway.
Yeah, I'm fine with unmasking perl-5.8.7 locally where I need SVK.
It's not a problem, I was more curious about perl-core policy than
anything else.
> Daniel, what's the big difference between Encode 2.08 and 2.10
> (provided by perl 5.8.6 and 5.8.7 respectively, IIRC)?
Mostly UTF-8 fixes, according to the Changes file. I don't know
specifically why SVK claims it needs 2.10.
--
Daniel Westermann-Clark
--
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list
|
|
