1 |
well, beu would probably answer better than me |
2 |
svn supports branching of cours, how is the question ;) |
3 |
and having a full tree support.. dunno if it's useful, but it can be done |
4 |
;p |
5 |
|
6 |
need an expert opinion on this one ;p |
7 |
|
8 |
In case we join everything in a big toolkit, is using the |
9 |
svn-with-full-tree the best way to do it ? |
10 |
|
11 |
I mean, the final aspect of the package sould be considered. If we import |
12 |
g-cpan now in a tree structure and add each small prog one after the other, |
13 |
it'll be easy (but changing package name en route would be mandatory then). |
14 |
|
15 |
So, to summarize, we've different solutions : |
16 |
|
17 |
1/ we put every tool in a tree structure right now and release a new |
18 |
package |
19 |
2/ we let g-cpan in his own tree (full-tree compliant) and think about |
20 |
merging way later |
21 |
3/ we don't touch anything ;) (except maybe a name change) |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
/me is not sure this mail is really clear.. bah, will see ;p |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Michael Cummings |
30 |
<mcummings@gento |
31 |
o.org> Pour |
32 |
gentoo-perl@l.g.o |
33 |
12/05/2005 15:00 cc |
34 |
|
35 |
Objet |
36 |
Veuillez Re: [gentoo-perl] perl gentoolkit ? |
37 |
répondre à |
38 |
gentoo-perl@gent |
39 |
oo.org |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
Still a good idea - was more on the horizon type idea (not this week). But |
48 |
your right, changing now is better than later :) |
49 |
|
50 |
While we're at changing though - do we want to consider a different dir |
51 |
structure? Like a bin/ man/ lib? set of dirs to store in? How does svn |
52 |
handle |
53 |
branching? (or do we even need to worry about branching?) I only ask |
54 |
because |
55 |
the tarball I push up when this is in portage has a bin/ and man/ (well, |
56 |
you |
57 |
know, for the script and the man page...duh...sorry...) and I wasn't sure |
58 |
if |
59 |
there was anything like that we should be doing on the back end (not |
60 |
burning |
61 |
on this one - i'm easy either way, just thought I'd throw it out there if |
62 |
dirs were going to get moved around anyway). |
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
On Thursday 12 May 2005 08:14 am, antoine.raillon@××××.com wrote: |
66 |
> dunno if this idea is still around, is it ? |
67 |
> |
68 |
> in case it is, we could use the same SVN as now, but then the 'gcpan' |
69 |
name |
70 |
> would be obsolete. changing it now would be easy, while waiting will give |
71 |
> more work ;p |
72 |
> |
73 |
> change / not change ? |
74 |
> |
75 |
> speak now or never ;) |
76 |
> |
77 |
> -- |
78 |
> cab |
79 |
|
80 |
-- |
81 |
|
82 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
83 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
84 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
85 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
86 |
[rattachement "attfjkfq.dat" supprimé par ANTOINE RAILLON - |
87 |
E233469/users/PSA] |
88 |
|
89 |
|
90 |
-- |
91 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |