Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-perl
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-perl@g.o
From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
Subject: Another g-cpan question
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:54:32 -0400
That's right folks, shape the future of the next release of g-cpan!

*cough* *cough*

OK, next question I'm torn on (btw, verdict with 2 whole feedbacks was
that YAML was an acceptable dep). I'm in a position where I can tweak
some simple code based on the more comprehensive dep list and list DEPs,
or I can take some time (and time == slightly larger memory footprint)
and maintain module-version in the DEP list. Thoughts? On the one hand,
g-cpan is a "for entertainment purposes only" tool, ie, the ebuilds it
generates are intended for use on your box only, not for mass
distribution to the masses (for starters, there's no such thing as QA on
what its doing - its the risk you take using something that blindly
installs cpan modules). On the other hand, the power is there to do
it...opinions?
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Replies:
Re: Another g-cpan question
-- Michael Cummings
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-perl: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Perl ebuilds needing updates (96)
Next by thread:
Re: Another g-cpan question
Previous by date:
Perl ebuilds needing updates (96)
Next by date:
Re: Another g-cpan question


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-perl mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.