List Archive: gentoo-perl
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 05:00 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Sorry I didn't make that clearer - the results below were generated
> _completely_ outside of portage; for each test I manually unpacked,
> perl Makefile.pl, make, make test in the traditional way. The only
> thing I can see that was different was the perl I used (same make, same
> version of Extutils::Command, etc. ).
But in the tests results you pasted (or at least what I read) the tests
failed in the same ways, the only discernable difference being from
different versions of Test::(more? simple? same package, you know what I
> I guess I will proceed to get into big trouble by building a perl in
> portage (overriding the standard) with the configuration I used in
> my /home/beau perl. If my system is still running :) I'll get back to
> you soon.
I'd be curious to see where the deliminating factor is that could result
in different return codes on dies...that's just plain lala :)
> PS: Sorry about posting the patch on the list - will bugzilla from now on.
Bah, if i didn't give the disclaimer, i'd regret it later. now i have it
in writing somewhere ;)
> Aloha => Beau;
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)