On Sunday 03 July 2005 10:50, Michele Beltrame wrote:
> Is this a problem in how Catalyst "announces" the missing prerequisites?
>

I suspect it is (most of those should be present as ebuilds already in portage 
at that). This all goes to one of the 2 underlying problems I have with how 
g-cpan currently detects dependancies - it doesn't note deps that are already 
installed, and it doesn't note versions of the deps. Instead it relies on 
cpan to notice the missing deps - but I'm not sure how this works if the 
module in question is using extutils::autoconfig and therefore sidestepping 
the cpan.pm detection (which I suspect happened to you in Catalyst).


Oh, for time and time and time to work on this :)


-- 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net 
-----o()o---------------------------------------------