| 1 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:01:54 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 |
| 7 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include |
| 9 |
> >> anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of |
| 10 |
> >> candidates for EAPI 5? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Let's continue this on the PMS list. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > * user patches |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > * EAPI parsing |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > * the things that were left out of 4: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > + slot operator deps |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> > + profile IUSE |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > * No -j1 for src_test |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> > * Remove deprecated stuff |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Hm, remove IMAGE. Anything else? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> > * Zero or one REQUIRED_USE operator |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> No objections from me to all of the above. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> > These might be cheap now? |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> > * New bash version |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Too early, IMHO. Let's implement EAPI parsing first, then wait for |
| 39 |
> some reasonable time (which presumably means EAPI 6). |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> Given the long time it's been in limbo I doubt that this will be a |
| 44 |
> quick feature. (But I'll be glad if you convince me of the opposite.) |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> Other cheap stuff: |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> * Mandate GNU find (bug 384157) |
| 49 |
> * Add an EBUILD_PHASE_FUNC variable (bug 390765) |
| 50 |
> * usex: new "use" type helper (bug 382963) |
| 51 |
> * econf: append --disable-silent-rules (bug 379497) |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> Ulrich |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
* IMPLICIT_IUSE |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Finally allow to write legal ebuilds respecting Prefix wish to not |
| 59 |
have to add prefix to IUSE. A solution was proposed and approved by |
| 60 |
council. |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366555 |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
* EJOBS |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Long standing wish. MAKEOPTS parsing for getting a job value is |
| 67 |
error prone as bug reports do prove. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_750e33f68b16d971dff1f40dd9145e56.xml |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
* doheader |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
thought myself before this should be available for consistency. |
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21310 |
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
* standard input for new* / here* helper |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
also rather cheap to implement. |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263565 |
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
Ralph |
Archives