Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:18:15
Message-Id: 20120410211601.58b2fb43@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:13:09 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> Anyway, what's the usage case for having the EAPI assignment after the > inherit command? Currently this is forbidden.
It is? By the spec, or by QA policy? If it's just the latter, we can't rely upon people following it. I think this whole thing goes away if you also require in the spec (i.e. PMS, not QA) that the EAPI assignment be done before anything else. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>